Friday 21 March 2014

Multi camera production

1) How does multi-camera production differ from single camera, what constraints are faced by multi-camera productions and what benefits does multi-camera production offer?


In typical multi-camera productions, dramatic actors have to memorize lines for a complete production. They may even have to go through the whole production without stopping. Lighting, audio, make-up, etc., have to work for long shots and close-ups, and for a variety of different camera angles. Soap operas (Emmeradale, Days of our Lives, Eastenders) talk shows (Graham Norton, Conan, Late Show with David Letterman) some sitcoms (Friends, How I Met Your Mother, The Big Bang Theory) more frequently use the multi-camera setup. Multiple camera shooting is the only way that a scene involving multiple actors performing in front of a live studio audience may be recorded from multiple perspectives. In the picture is one of the three main sets used in the multi-camera sitcom Friends. The set is Joey and Chandler’s bedroom, in Episode 222, The One With The Cake (Season 10 Episode 4).In the photo above there are three cameras being manned, with possibly another which isn’t in the photo. The lighting and the set is set up easily in a soundstage, but a lot of lights are being used, 18 are visible in this picture, no doubt there are more. This is so that an entire scene can be filmed, theoretically, in one take. The lighting arrangments and the number of cameras means that setting up would normally be a very time consuming process, but with a big-budget sitcom like Friends, there are a lot of men on the set to make this job very quick. 

Multi-camera compared to single-camera production.
A disadvantage of single-camera production is that filming each shot individually and setting up the lighting for each shot can take much longer than filming one entire scene in multi-camera. In some cases, it can sometimes be more expensive to produce than multi-camera because it takes much longer to produce a single scene, and the post production editing time can be very time consuming. If a multi-camera production is edited live, then there is little to no post production editing needed. Obviously in single camera, one singular camera is recording at one time. There may be more than one camera being used by the film crew, but they will not be set up and connected together like in multi-camera. In single camera is it reasonably more difficult to create a sense of realism with the cuts in post-production editing, because in multi-camera everything is happening live but in single camera, you have to work to get it to look live (matching up frames and creating fluid transmissions). 
Multi camera production is a method of shooting television programs, live events (for example football games and rock concerts) and films where several cameras are employed on the set to record or broadcast a scene simultaneously. Usually, there are two outer cameras for close shots of the most active characters and a central camera for the master shot, capturing the overall action and establishing the geography of the set.
Disadvantages include a less optimized lighting which needs to provide a compromise for all camera angles and less flexibility in putting the necessary equipment on scene, such as microphone booms and lighting rigs. These can be efficiently hidden from just one camera but can be more complicated to set up and their placement may be inferior in a multiple-camera setup. While shooting, the director and assistant director create a line cut by instructing the vision mixer to switch between the feed from the individual cameras. In the case of sitcoms with studio audience, this line cut is typically displayed to them on studio monitors. The line cut might be refined later in editing, as often the output from all cameras is recorded, both separately and as a combined reference display called the q­ split. 

The video below is a video of Oasis playing in Manchester in 2005. At the start of the video at 3:20, a few seconds into the first song, the show is stopped because of a problem with the barrier at the front of the crowd, and they needed the crowd to step back from the front in order to fix the barrier. Multi-camera is used well in this instance as the cameras are filming parts of the situation which are relevant to what's happening. For example, when the song is stopped and Noel is letting the crowd know what's happening, Noel says "take two or three steps back from the back, get it sorted..." there is a shot from the crowd's point of view followed by a shot of the team telling people to move back, and a wide shot of the crowd of the broken barrier. When Noel continues to joke about the crew are going to lose their jobs as a result, there is a shot of him pointing towards the crew and then a shot of the crew's reactions. 
This is a good example of live multi-camera because it shows the possibility and adaptability of multi-camera production. Single camera wouldn't work in this instance because using one camera would mean that the camera would have to be repositioned for each shot.



In a live event such as a sports event or a music concert, multi-camera set-up is the only method that can be used. It allows the entire event to be shown, and nothing is missed. For example in a football game, you can go back to specific things that have happened for different angles, because the multiple camera set-up has allowed there to be several cameras trained on the same thing, live. This wouldn't work in single camera as you would miss the action, and the live event is only happening once. Multi-camera is used very effectively in live music concerts, which differ to sports events as there are no replays and all the cameras are showing different aspects of the show (for example wide shot, crowd, singer, drummer etc.). This is so that it is interesting to the viewer and it makes it more entertaining. in most instances the sports and live music shows are being broadcasted on live television and so the editing is done there and then, as it happens. This eliminates the need to edit in post-production, which saves a lot of time. Also it is not possible when it's being broadcast live on TV. It is also a virtual necessity for regular, high-output shows like daily soap operas, which often film several episodes a day and need quick and easy and cheap production method. Once the camera and the lighting are set up, the entire scene can be shot in one take if needed which saves a lot of time compared to single camera where you would be needing to set up the lighting in each and every shot, a reposition cameras, and make sure there was continuity. Disadvantages include a less optimized lighting which needs to provide a compromise for all the camera angles used and less flexibility in putting the necessary equipment on scene, such as microphone booms and lighting rigs. These can be efficiently hidden from just one camera but can be more complicated to set up and their placement may be inferior in a multiple-camera setup. 

4) Analyse a 5 minute section from one studio based and one live-event based multi-camera production and discuss the techniques employed in each. How many cameras have been used and how and why have they been positioned as they are? Discuss use of camera (movement, framing and angles), coverage of action, lighting, editing, sound (diegetic and non-diegetic) and any use of effects or graphics. Try to use the correct terminology throughout your discussion. 

The video I have chosen to analyse is a section of the video that I have used above, between 1:02:17 and 1:07:30.
At the start when before the song starts, there is a wide shot of the stage, waiting for the next song to start so that they director can cut to different relevant cameras. The wide shots are used as a safety net so that if something goes wrong with some of the cameras or the direction of the vision mixer, then the wide is there to fall back on. When the drummer starts the beat at the start of the song, the video cuts to two closeups or the drummer, which have already been in position as the camera direction will know the song and will know beforehand which shots to position. There is then a wide from the crowd's point of view of the stage (again another safety shot) which moves nice and smooth into a tracking dolly shot of the piano being played as that is a dominant instrument in the intro of the song. The shots are relevant to the song that's being played. There is then a quick shot of the drummer as the intro drum fill is played, which is a well choreographed shot. This version of the video may as well be edited after in post-production, in order to get the shot timings right if the team messed up, but most of it will be edited straight off as it happens. Another well timed shot is when there is a cross-dissolve transition into a close up of the singer as he starts singing. Then a slow fade to a wide shot of the audience, and another shot from the audience's point of view which are like filling shots while the first verse is played, which could be because there is less to work with because than a specific instrument as like in a guitar solo for example. There is a few shots like this on different band members and then a shot of Noel as he does the guitar fill which leads into the chorus. There is then an extreme wide shot of the crowd as you can hear them singing along to the song. During lots of shots of the crowd, there is a shot of Noel singing away from the microphone, which is the reason behind there not being any vocals heard from the band, which helps the viewer understand what's going on. There is then a shot if the lead guitarist as another guitar fill is played. Mostly all the effects that are used during the video are cross-dissolves which could have been edited into the live show or added in post-production before it was broadcast. The effect is used effectively because the song is quite a slow-moving song, and the dissolve makes the cuts smoother. In a more faced-paced song, the cuts will just be straight cuts and the shots will be a lot quicker and less smooth. The sound is all from the output of the sound mixer, which will be mixed live by sound engineers, but there will be a separate sound engineer for the output for the live TV show because they sounds needed for the crowd and the TV differ greatly (i.e. the sound of the crowd is not played through the stage speakers). There aren't a lot of effects needed to be added onto this multi-camera production as it will all be done live. There are many cameras used, there are at least four on stage, with four wide shots, and at least two at the sound desk for close ups of the singers. And more at the foot of the stage. It is difficult to tell as in a production like this, the cameras are constantly moving all over the place. 




The second video that I am analyzing is a section of an episode of Mock The Week. The show is filmed in studio in multi-camera. The first part of the video is when the guests and the presenter are discussing a photo. The VT of the picture is used, and when they are playing the game and saying what they think the headline of the photo is, the VT is quickly shown to show a reference to show what they are talking about. There is one camera on the presenter, two cameras on each of the three guests on each side. And a close up camera on each row of three, making at least five cameras in total. The wide shots are used as a back-up as the close-up cameras are moving to each guest who are talking. There is a medium shot of the presenter and this camera will always stay just on him because he is the most frequent speaker and the center of the show and will always need to be gone back to in the show. The show doesn't get broadcast live, so some post-production is available if anything goes wrong. 

Friday 7 March 2014

Media Production Unit 23 - Multi-camera - Production Blog

Production Diary for Multi-Camera Production
(a)

Tuesday 25th Feb -

We found out who was in our group, and then got together and discussed ideas. It went well.

Wednesday 26th Feb -

Another group discussion, ran through some examples of multi-camera production in the studio, which were fun and got us really hyped for the project we're doing! We had an idea but we're still in disagreement over it.

Thursday 27th Feb

Working on pitch which is due in on Friday.

Friday 28th Feb -

Group discussion doing work for the pitch. We now have a clear idea which we have all decided on which is the news idea.

Tuesday 4th March -

Group discussions, and mind map completed.

Wednesday 5th March - 

Planned out the set design.

Thursday 6th March -

Forward planning sheets, studio work, floor plan completed (lights, cameras, seating) Questions for vox pops.

Friday 7th March -

Co tinted with the script, set layout, logo designs and music progress. We sorted out our folders and added to the questions that will be used in the show.

Tuesday 11th March -

Continued with script went to the set and set up lights, made sure it's all sorted. We also did our first run through of the show. Also other things like the music and planning shooting dates (tomorrow) for vts.

Wednesday 12th March -

Ash and Izzy went to film some of the vox pops which we lost the SD card several days later.

Thursday 13th March - Enterprise week 

Wednesday 19th March - 

Vox pops filmed, had another practice/run through of the show, we were testing the show for the two presenter format, which we had doubts about at first, but it was our original idea and when we ran through it and it worked really well. The script had to me adjusted slightly because the questions that we were asking the students in studio were the same as the questions that we were asking students in the vox pops . we lost the sd card so we had to film some more vox pops and presenter links with izzy and Alice.

Thursday 20 March - 

Filmed a lot of vox pops today for the vt about enterprise week. Finished the script and progressed on set design (completely changed the whole thing). 

Tuesday 26th March -

We filmed the production on Tuesday. We recorded the whole thing on the first take. The production went really well, the only thing that let it down was the guests. Our choice in guests could've been better. 

(b)
- What was your role and what were your responsibilities?
My role was the sound desk, setting up the lights, hot heads, camera positioning, set layout (chairs, table, set boxes etc) stage plan, partly helped with the script, part editing of the VTs (critical last minute edit before shoot), setting up microphones, sound checks, on camera with Izzy doing vox pops (which we lost), parts of the set design, getting plants for the set and setting up all the cameras on the day (white balance, exposure, framing etc). 
- How well did you carry out the tasks you were allocated?
I feel like I carried out my tasks well, but at times I lacked the motivation to help as a team, which was due to some unhealthy relationships in the group and some personality clashes. I think for me personally I could've been a better leader, as sometimes the group lacked guidance. All the practical tasks that I was allocated turned out very well done in the end. The sound at the time of the shooting was good. 

- How well did you work as part of the team?
As I mentioned above, we could've worked better as a team if it wasn't for a strong personality clash in the group. I think that in a professional situation if there was such a clash then they would just have to put it behind them and get on with the task that they have been allocated and not let it affect their profession work. 

- How could your contribution have been improved?
I feel as though I could've been more motivated and worked harder at times, and I personally could've worked to bring peace to the group as I think this was a critical matter in the turnout and the quality of the production. 


- Looking at the P3, M3, and D3 criteria, what criteria do you think you have achieved? Try to justify this grade honestly with reference to the way you performed in your operational role. 
Looking a the criteria, I think that I have achieved a merit. I think that individually I needed some assistance at times but generally I worked to a good technical standard, because of my roles such as sound, camera setup and set planning. These things were critical to our group and helped maintain the good technical standard.

Friday 10 January 2014

Single Camera Production Blog

10/01/2014

Production Pitch 
On Tuesday we got given the Single Camera Production brief. On Wednesday we worked one our ideas for the project. On Thursday we decided on a final idea, and completed the pitch. We pitched our short film to the group today (Friday).

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Pitch
Genre – Drama
Plot – Man standing on a rooftop, looking back on his life. He has a series of flashbacks to when he was in a happy relationship and about to become a father. His girlfriend gets kicked out of her parent’s home after they find out that she’s pregnant. She goes to live with the man but arguments start because of the stress of having a baby. The girl gets post mortem depression and kills herself/ODs. He ponders about jumping of the rooftop for a while and then decides not to because of his responsibility and his love for his child.
Characters – Man, Girl, Girl’s Father and Mother, baby and a toddler.
Location – Rooftop, Girl’s house and Man’s house.
Casting – Performing Arts 
Production Schedule – Next week.
Other Films – Limitless

Roles
Jazmine - Producer
Kim – Director
Sam – Assistant Director/Sound
Ash – Camera/Editor
Anna – Camera
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Changes to pitch from feedback.
We received some feedback on our pitch which included a tightening on the roles within the group. I am now the editor and Anna is on camera. Research into post natal depression, and the main character has it and not the woman. She also does not kill her self, they just fall out. We changed the rooftop to a cliff top because that way the main character can have a progressive journey towards the cliff edge which wouldn't be possible. 
Production Schedule.
The Script is going to be done over the weekend and Monday and we will continue from that point. Jazmine will be contacting the Performing Arts at the college for our actors. 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

15/01/2014

Started the writing of the Treatment to be presented in front of the class on Friday 17th, also finished Production Schedule.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

16/01/2014

Finished the Treatment for presentation tomorrow. Locations and Cast profiles also finished.



---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

17/01/2014


Presented our treatment to the class.


---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

22/01/2014

Jasmine Started the script (1st paragraph) 

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

23/01/2014

Me and Sam finished the rest of the script. (the other 99%)



Finished locations. 
Started shot list. 



---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

28/01/2014

Me and Sam completed 50% of the shot list. 
Jaz and Anna did.......................
Jazmine has plans to start the storyboard possibly tomorrow afternoon.
Role change. I am now on camera and Anna is the editor!



---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

29/01/2014

Revised the shot list.
Sam did the character costumes.
Jazmine started the storyboard! 
Anna and Kim are off.

 ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------